Today The School celebrates Halloween...well, not so much celebrate, but we allow the boys to don their most creative costumes and have a middle school version of a Halloween Parade. This morning, I was greeted by Pac-Man and a not-so friendly ghost, a huge "My name is..." name tag, a hoard of punk rock chics, a paper bag, and even a minature version of Jack Black's Nacho Libre character. I decided that I'd be a Queen Bee, minus the tiara, of course. What an awesome start to the day.
Yesterday (and borrowing a discussion tool from a colleague), I decided to try a partnered silent discussion with one of my English sections. I haven't yet done it with the boys in my study, but I have a feeling it will go over well. Using three critical questions that I initially put in my research protocol, I crafted a worksheet that would allow the boys to "discuss" important themes, symbols, and ideas in the short story, "Girl." Yesterday, I found that by allowing the boys the time to think, write, and respond to each other (instead of getting lost in a whole class discussion), I am better able to assess their understanding and hear their voices. Beyond this, the activity seems like it'd work well for prediscussion too.
I'm looking forward to seeing how it goes...
Signing off...
Friday, October 29, 2010
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Does Standardization Inhibit Innovation and Creativity?? (from October 18th)
So today, while on the school bus back from a XC meet, I read an article by Susan Lytle about the intersections of professionalism and praxis that seem to miss the realm of teaching...at least from the perspective of misdirected folk. She highlighted her experience reading about the work of a medical doctor. How do doctors get better? She posits that doctors work within their roles (i.e. do research) to best assess procedures and practices that could be better. They are reflective, they make mistakes, and they teach each other. Based on what seems to be constant reflection, she shows that teacher research is much like the work doctors do in order to be better.
After reading this article, I thought about my experience in a public school and teaching in alignment with the state's standard course of study. Too often, I heard from colleagues (either in that state or elsewhere with standardized curricula) that they "had to teach to the test" or that they had no agency in what they taught because it [the books, novels, and poems in my case] did not resonate with them personally. I'll admit that this wasn't a sentiment that escaped me. My first year teaching British Literature felt like torture. How could I effectively transmit the themes of The Canturybury Tales or Beowulf when I had no real interest in the language or the imagery the authors used? It wasn't until the second time around (and a few failed lessons under my belt) that I realized the problem wasn't the texts. Yes, too often my kids were only exposed to works by "dead, White, Protestant men," but I did have the authority (and the obligation I feel) to widen this perspective.
So, as I mesh Lytle's message on being better through teacher research (on of my goals for this project), I also think a shift in POV about what we teach is important. This year, because I'm at The School, I have much more flexibility than I've ever had, but there are still standards, still classics that I must incorporate. Does standardization inhibit innovation and creativity??
I don't think so.
Signing off..
After reading this article, I thought about my experience in a public school and teaching in alignment with the state's standard course of study. Too often, I heard from colleagues (either in that state or elsewhere with standardized curricula) that they "had to teach to the test" or that they had no agency in what they taught because it [the books, novels, and poems in my case] did not resonate with them personally. I'll admit that this wasn't a sentiment that escaped me. My first year teaching British Literature felt like torture. How could I effectively transmit the themes of The Canturybury Tales or Beowulf when I had no real interest in the language or the imagery the authors used? It wasn't until the second time around (and a few failed lessons under my belt) that I realized the problem wasn't the texts. Yes, too often my kids were only exposed to works by "dead, White, Protestant men," but I did have the authority (and the obligation I feel) to widen this perspective.
So, as I mesh Lytle's message on being better through teacher research (on of my goals for this project), I also think a shift in POV about what we teach is important. This year, because I'm at The School, I have much more flexibility than I've ever had, but there are still standards, still classics that I must incorporate. Does standardization inhibit innovation and creativity??
I don't think so.
Signing off..
Underway...
It's been a bit more than a week since my last post and Listening In is in full swing at The School. The boys really seem interested in delving more into themselves as they explore characters, talk about what it means to be a young man, and engage with each other.
By happenstance I found a really interesting short story by Lois Gould titled, X: A Story of Childhood. I'd already chosen my "gender" short story for this project, but I couldn't help using it. The story centers on a baby raised in a unique experiment; could a child be raised gender neutral? In the story, Mom and Dad go against the grain in their interactions with Baby X (Mom teaches the baby about sports; Dad encourages cooking and Barbies). The boys were perplexed with such an idea at first. They asked questions that centered around biology (genetic "sex") and how Baby X would fare in adolesence. We discussed the feasiblity of such an experiment and then I had the boys craft a "glimpse" of what life would be like for X as a teen. What advantages or difficulties would X face? What the boys produced was great. It was one of their first creative writing opportunities and they exceled. The story was a great prelude to short story chosen for the project, "Girl."
Yesterday, I decided to have the boys write down a typical day's schedule (from the moment the wake up until they fall asleep). Last week, I'd asked the boys to think about how being a boy influenced their home lives. Do they have specific responsibilities or chores? Are they expected to carry themselves in a particular fashion (either at home or because of what they've been taught at home)? The responses that I received were good, but they didn't necessarily get as specific as I'd hoped. I decided to break down the task even further. How could I get at those expectations, chores, and tasks without frankly saying that's what I was looking for?
I came up with a few things I could use for daily writing prompts:
After this task, I assigned Jamaica Kincaid's very short story, "Girl." We've simultaneously been learning and writing with semi-colons/commas, so the boys have been quick to point out the grammatical nuances of the story. Later this week, we'll discuss the story in depth. I wonder if they'll see how each of the daily writing prompts (written from their male perspective) relates to the protagonist of the story?
Signing off...
By happenstance I found a really interesting short story by Lois Gould titled, X: A Story of Childhood. I'd already chosen my "gender" short story for this project, but I couldn't help using it. The story centers on a baby raised in a unique experiment; could a child be raised gender neutral? In the story, Mom and Dad go against the grain in their interactions with Baby X (Mom teaches the baby about sports; Dad encourages cooking and Barbies). The boys were perplexed with such an idea at first. They asked questions that centered around biology (genetic "sex") and how Baby X would fare in adolesence. We discussed the feasiblity of such an experiment and then I had the boys craft a "glimpse" of what life would be like for X as a teen. What advantages or difficulties would X face? What the boys produced was great. It was one of their first creative writing opportunities and they exceled. The story was a great prelude to short story chosen for the project, "Girl."
Yesterday, I decided to have the boys write down a typical day's schedule (from the moment the wake up until they fall asleep). Last week, I'd asked the boys to think about how being a boy influenced their home lives. Do they have specific responsibilities or chores? Are they expected to carry themselves in a particular fashion (either at home or because of what they've been taught at home)? The responses that I received were good, but they didn't necessarily get as specific as I'd hoped. I decided to break down the task even further. How could I get at those expectations, chores, and tasks without frankly saying that's what I was looking for?
I came up with a few things I could use for daily writing prompts:
- typical day's schedule
- manners learned at home or expected at home
- what does a mess look like? smell like? how would this compare to how a girl might answer this question?
After this task, I assigned Jamaica Kincaid's very short story, "Girl." We've simultaneously been learning and writing with semi-colons/commas, so the boys have been quick to point out the grammatical nuances of the story. Later this week, we'll discuss the story in depth. I wonder if they'll see how each of the daily writing prompts (written from their male perspective) relates to the protagonist of the story?
Signing off...
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
The AllSpark??
So, I must admit I wasn't the hugest Transformers fan as a kid. I was more inclined to watch He-Man and She-Ra or Thundercats. Interestingly, though, I started teaching "for real" when the newest franchise of Transformer flicks bombarded the big screen a few years back. It was almost a given that at any particular moment someone in one of my classes would ask, "Hey, Ms. Primus, do you mind if we call you Optimus Prime?" Not really wanting to be aligned with a cartoon character, I initially brushed off the association and told my students back then, "No, it's okay, you can call me Ms. Primus or Ms. P" and didn't think much of it. Every once in while, though, either while subbing or during an off moment (like a school football game) the Optimus Prime thing would come up randomly.
It wasn't until I started teaching at The School that I really forced myself to think about this cat named Optimus Prime. Of course there's the obvious connection because of my last name, but maybe there could be more to it...who knew. That year, as before, several students asked the same question, "Can we call you Optimus Prime" and this time instead of brushing it off as a joke, I said maybe. Being my quirky self, I actually went to the Hasbro website and did some research on this character...lame, I know. But, he was particularly intriguing, especially given my vocation. He's a Prime...from a long lineage of Primes, sworn to protect and lead by example...a little serendipitous considering my perspective on education.
In a recent graduate class, I mentioned to my peers that I became a teacher to be a non-conformist. Most people don't believe me when I say that I tried to avoid this "job" as much as could given covert grooming (thanks Mom!) and personality tendencies that I have. It wasn't that I thought teaching was a sub-par career choice...far from it! Growing up and as I entered adulthood, I believed that teaching needed to be a "calling." As cliche as it sounds, I didn't want to "mess kids up" or take on the magnitude of social and intellectual burdens that I'd observed so many of my teachers carry. From the excellent to the inept (and I have had a few), the educators in my life have always been an inspiration. I didn't know, especially because of peer pressure in college to do something more financially lucrative, if I wanted the responsibility to inspire...I didn't know if I'd have "it."
After trying my hand at other industries, I had to reflect on what mattered to me...
I thought back to the days when I "played school" with my siblings and cousins. I thought about tutoring and being a camp counselor; I reflected on Parents' Nights as a high school Ambassador and days of RA training. These moments, interacting with others, learning together, experiencing "stuff," were what mattered most. The elusive "it" didn't seem to matter much anymore. I enjoyed learning...especially learning with other people. It was an experience that I wanted to replicate.
And so, why the AllSpark? Why the penname? I guess I believe that my students have the ability to transform the ordinary. I take my role as an educator seriously...humility won't allow "leader" to enter my frame of reference, but I see myself as a facilitator.
For the longest time I've had the following quote as part of my email signature:
"The ability of writers to imagine what is not the self, to familiarize the strange and mystify the familiar, is the test of their power." ~Toni Morrison
As a teacher, this "power," this spark that I believe is inherent to my students is worth protecting...I'm not as sagacious as Optimus Prime and I don't have the ability to become a MackTruck. But as we learn together (chessy, I know), and confront important questions, we can hopefully dismantle the Decepticons around us.
Signing off...
It wasn't until I started teaching at The School that I really forced myself to think about this cat named Optimus Prime. Of course there's the obvious connection because of my last name, but maybe there could be more to it...who knew. That year, as before, several students asked the same question, "Can we call you Optimus Prime" and this time instead of brushing it off as a joke, I said maybe. Being my quirky self, I actually went to the Hasbro website and did some research on this character...lame, I know. But, he was particularly intriguing, especially given my vocation. He's a Prime...from a long lineage of Primes, sworn to protect and lead by example...a little serendipitous considering my perspective on education.
In a recent graduate class, I mentioned to my peers that I became a teacher to be a non-conformist. Most people don't believe me when I say that I tried to avoid this "job" as much as could given covert grooming (thanks Mom!) and personality tendencies that I have. It wasn't that I thought teaching was a sub-par career choice...far from it! Growing up and as I entered adulthood, I believed that teaching needed to be a "calling." As cliche as it sounds, I didn't want to "mess kids up" or take on the magnitude of social and intellectual burdens that I'd observed so many of my teachers carry. From the excellent to the inept (and I have had a few), the educators in my life have always been an inspiration. I didn't know, especially because of peer pressure in college to do something more financially lucrative, if I wanted the responsibility to inspire...I didn't know if I'd have "it."
After trying my hand at other industries, I had to reflect on what mattered to me...
I thought back to the days when I "played school" with my siblings and cousins. I thought about tutoring and being a camp counselor; I reflected on Parents' Nights as a high school Ambassador and days of RA training. These moments, interacting with others, learning together, experiencing "stuff," were what mattered most. The elusive "it" didn't seem to matter much anymore. I enjoyed learning...especially learning with other people. It was an experience that I wanted to replicate.
And so, why the AllSpark? Why the penname? I guess I believe that my students have the ability to transform the ordinary. I take my role as an educator seriously...humility won't allow "leader" to enter my frame of reference, but I see myself as a facilitator.
For the longest time I've had the following quote as part of my email signature:
"The ability of writers to imagine what is not the self, to familiarize the strange and mystify the familiar, is the test of their power." ~Toni Morrison
As a teacher, this "power," this spark that I believe is inherent to my students is worth protecting...I'm not as sagacious as Optimus Prime and I don't have the ability to become a MackTruck. But as we learn together (chessy, I know), and confront important questions, we can hopefully dismantle the Decepticons around us.
Signing off...
Friday, October 8, 2010
A History Lesson...
Earlier this summer, my advisor pushed me to think critically about why doing a study on boys' and curriculum meaning making (a jargon-esque term = what do boys get from the texts I pick in English class and how does their understanding translate to their writing?) mattered. I reminisced over the course of several weeks in the summer and went back to when I started at The School...
As a new teacher, I didn't have the authority (or time) to inact major changes to the 8th grade English curriculum and inherited a pretty "standard" list of texts: The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglas, Of Mice and Men, Animal Farm, Twelve Angry Men, and Romeo and Juliet. I immediately sensed that there were voices missing...perspectives, ideas, and humor almost invisible. After polling a few of my former students (I taught in the South for two years), I quickly decided on using The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time Indian (Alexie) for the 2009-2010 school year and was determined to "reimagine" the cannonical texts I had inherited. An early conversation with RJ, one of my students, I remembered, seemed to periodically poke at my academic sensibilites throughout the year...
We'd just finished reading Twelve Angry Men, I think, and my ears rose to attention when I heard him grumbling about the play. The words "boring" and "depressing" crept into my multitasking teacher frame and I called him out. I wanted to know what he thought and asked what could be better. I asked what he liked ("Sci-Fi") and it seemed to me that the student voice was also almost invisible in my classroom and it others. I began having random conversations with students about reading and what kind of experiences they had in English classes. What was "boring" and why did they think it was that way? In an attempt to focus the incessant questions I bombarded myself with (and with the help of a colleague) I applied for a research grant. I wanted to know a few things:
And so, my works begins...well, not exactly. It is October when I'm supposed to start this project, but I still have to get through the Institutional Review Board process...whew!
As a new teacher, I didn't have the authority (or time) to inact major changes to the 8th grade English curriculum and inherited a pretty "standard" list of texts: The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglas, Of Mice and Men, Animal Farm, Twelve Angry Men, and Romeo and Juliet. I immediately sensed that there were voices missing...perspectives, ideas, and humor almost invisible. After polling a few of my former students (I taught in the South for two years), I quickly decided on using The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-time Indian (Alexie) for the 2009-2010 school year and was determined to "reimagine" the cannonical texts I had inherited. An early conversation with RJ, one of my students, I remembered, seemed to periodically poke at my academic sensibilites throughout the year...
We'd just finished reading Twelve Angry Men, I think, and my ears rose to attention when I heard him grumbling about the play. The words "boring" and "depressing" crept into my multitasking teacher frame and I called him out. I wanted to know what he thought and asked what could be better. I asked what he liked ("Sci-Fi") and it seemed to me that the student voice was also almost invisible in my classroom and it others. I began having random conversations with students about reading and what kind of experiences they had in English classes. What was "boring" and why did they think it was that way? In an attempt to focus the incessant questions I bombarded myself with (and with the help of a colleague) I applied for a research grant. I wanted to know a few things:
- What do boys "get" from English literature?
- What role can they play in the development of English curriculum? Does it matter that they do?
- How do I (as a teacher) influence what they experience in class?
And so, my works begins...well, not exactly. It is October when I'm supposed to start this project, but I still have to get through the Institutional Review Board process...whew!
Friday, October 1, 2010
Why the Blog?
In an age when contact with the opinions of others is no longer a choice, it took a long time for me to decide whether or not a blog (or any type of digital journal) would be the best means for me to record my thoughts and observations this school year...
As an English teacher (don't hold me to proper grammar and syntax), I'd always been a fan of the 'ol trusty pen and paper, but this year...this year in particular, I was prompted to record, what would have otherwise been transcribed in a perfectly functional leather bound and lineless journal, onto this blog. I caved, but for good reason I might say.
This year, unlike previous school years, I had the wonderful opportunity to become my own guinea pig and bring a group of unlikely students along with me. Becoming a teacher-researcher has its perks, but I knew when drafting my proposal that coding data from handwritten notes would be hell. So, while aligning myself with this "push toward 21st century skills" would be admirable, I was much more concerned with the ease of coding that a digital blog would provide.
And so, this blog is dedicated to the whims of mind that I (and my students) take as we "transform" our understanding, interactions, and processes of creation in our 8th grade English classroom.
The moniker was their predecessors' gift to me and is almost appropos for this endeavor.
Signing off...
As an English teacher (don't hold me to proper grammar and syntax), I'd always been a fan of the 'ol trusty pen and paper, but this year...this year in particular, I was prompted to record, what would have otherwise been transcribed in a perfectly functional leather bound and lineless journal, onto this blog. I caved, but for good reason I might say.
This year, unlike previous school years, I had the wonderful opportunity to become my own guinea pig and bring a group of unlikely students along with me. Becoming a teacher-researcher has its perks, but I knew when drafting my proposal that coding data from handwritten notes would be hell. So, while aligning myself with this "push toward 21st century skills" would be admirable, I was much more concerned with the ease of coding that a digital blog would provide.
And so, this blog is dedicated to the whims of mind that I (and my students) take as we "transform" our understanding, interactions, and processes of creation in our 8th grade English classroom.
The moniker was their predecessors' gift to me and is almost appropos for this endeavor.
Signing off...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)